Nicely, yeah, though the purpose was some people think about issues aren’t spiraling uncontrolled in any respect as you place it, however somewhat, issues are extra secure now because the police merely stand down with petty thieves, drivers with expired plates, looters, whoever. What’s key to grasp right here that there is not any carve-out on this judicial philosophy for the kind automobile concerned nor what automobile (or property) a sufferer could personal. It would not matter if the sufferer owned a motorcycle, a automotive, rode the ‘el, or walked and had their footwear stolen. What scores as a win on this philosophy is that the criminals do not should have contact with the police, or jail. Stealing a motorcycle is taken into account a non-violent workplace, and sure folks don’t desire that occasion to end result within the felony having contact with the police (or jail) as a result of that is thought-about unfair to the felony. The entire level is to let the thieves off the hook, as a result of that is higher: https://www.vera.org/information/what-happened-when-boston-stopped-prosecu…Which is to say below that philosophy, bike house owners and automotive house owners who’re the victims of theft simply want to simply suck it up and let it occur, as a result of there are an entire bunch of oldsters arguing that the bike house owners’ loss (amongst others) is best for society.