The FIA has lately come beneath hearth for allegedly overreacting after Max Verstappen and Charles Leclerc used profanity through the newest official press conferences. The differing penalties handed to the Purple Bull and Scuderia Ferrari drivers by motorsport’s governing physique have sparked debate, with many questioning the rationale behind the contrasting punishments.
Forward of the Singapore Grand Prix, the Dutchman obtained a group service penalty from the FIA for utilizing the f-word within the drivers’ press convention. Observers felt this was the FIA’s method of setting an instance with the three-time Components 1 champion, coinciding with FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem’s name for drivers to be conscious of their language. The Purple Bull man responded by opting out of additional FIA press conferences on the Marina Bay avenue circuit that weekend, as an alternative holding his personal media periods.
Charles Leclerc, in distinction, was fined €10,000—€5,000 of which was suspended for a 12 months—after his personal use of profanity following the Mexico Metropolis Grand Prix on the 4.304-kilometre Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez. Based on the FIA, the Ferrari driver’s lighter penalty was justified because of the nature of the query he was answering, which they seen as main, in addition to his quick apology, not like Max Verstappen.
When Components 1 followers had been surveyed by the racingnews365 web site on the FIA’s method, precisely 50% believed that neither driver ought to have been penalized in any respect. Simply over 31% felt that the FIA had set a precedent and may have handled each drivers equally. The remaining 19% agreed that the circumstances warranted totally different penalties for every driver, contemplating the distinct contexts of every state of affairs.
Nov 6, 2024
Let different Scuderia Followers find out about us
