LeBron James’ former teammate Kendrick Perkins has make clear why LeBron and the Lakers franchise aren’t on the identical web page.
Earlier than James re-signed with the Lakers on a two-year $104 million max deal, it was being reported that he was keen to take a pay reduce so the Lakers might signal a big-name participant.
Perk already publicly voiced his disbelief, saying earlier this week that the league’s best scorer wouldn’t truly be keen to do this.
He’s now doubled down on his take and given his trustworthy ideas about why the storied franchise might be in bother.
“The GOAT does it once more. King James’ longevity… one other $100 million in his checking account,” Perkins stated on ESPN‘s First Take. “He truly took the max {dollars}. When he gave Rob Pelinka greater than sufficient time to do one thing. He stated he was going to take a pay reduce. For Rob Pelinka to go on the market and search the market… Everyone knows that LeBron James needed Klay Thompson – they missed out on that to the Dallas Mavericks.
“I don’t understand how as a result of all he needed to do was supply one thing of good high quality to the Golden State Warriors to make a sign-and-trade occur. However he dropped the ball on that. Right here’s the factor when it comes all the way down to LeBron James and the Los Angeles Lakers proper now.
“To me, it looks like they’re on two completely different pages. When it comes all the way down to LeBron, the rationale he needed to take a pay reduce is for the easy indisputable fact that he desires to win now at a excessive degree. Each single time he steps on the ground, LeBron James is considering championships.
“Rob Pelinka is considering the longer term. I believe when you’ve gotten somebody like LeBron James, who is taken into account one of many best if not the best participant of all time, you bought to benefit from that, do what you have to do to be sure you put championship-caliber gamers round him so he can exit and full the mission.”
READ MORE: Why Everybody Is Flawed About Bronny James’ Contract
