A lot has been made from Jalen Hurts’ responses to 2 questions on Nick Sirianni greater than every week in the past now.
Most likely an excessive amount of.
Had this trade occurred, say, throughout a recreation week … and even earlier within the offseason exercise program … it won’t be getting as a lot consideration as it’s proper now when there simply isn’t a lot else happening news-wise.
That being stated, multiple factor might be true. Hurts’ feedback won’t be well worth the full extent of consideration they’ve been producing, not less than regionally. However the responses may also be greater than a complete non-issue.
On the latter level, try the next part from Jeff McLane’s newest “unCovering the Birds” podcast for the Inquirer (daring emphasis is mine):
“It was, evidently, an ungainly trade. Hurts was given the chance to say one thing constructive about his coach … and ended up not saying a lot in any respect. Possibly he misunderstood the query? I don’t wish to make an excessive amount of of the second.
But when Hurts has proven something throughout his time in Philadelphia, it’s that he’s intentional in virtually the whole lot he does.
Based on staff sources, his dealing with of this query about Sirianni proper earlier than the Eagles parted earlier than the summer time upset a number of key figures throughout the group.”
So, it’s not identical to persons are attempting to make one thing out of a complete nothing-burger right here. Apparently there’s a sentiment throughout the staff that Hurts may’ve dealt with this case higher than he did.
